One of the defining characteristics of real estate investing is how it interacts with the tax code.
Depreciation, cost segregation, and depreciation recapture can materially influence after-tax outcomes, but they are often misunderstood. These concepts do not create economic value on their own – they affect when taxes are paid and how income and gains are recognized.
This article explains how depreciation works in real estate syndications, how cost segregation accelerates it, and what depreciation recapture means when an investment exits.
Depreciation is a non-cash expense that reflects the IRS-mandated allocation of a property’s cost over time.
In practical terms, depreciation allows investors to deduct a portion of a property’s value each year, even if the property is generating positive cash flow.
It’s important to understand what depreciation does not represent:
It is not a cash expense
It does not reflect actual property wear in real time
It does not eliminate taxes permanently
Depreciation primarily affects timing, not total economic return.
In a syndication, depreciation is allocated to investors based on their ownership interest.
These deductions may:
Offset taxable income from the investment
Reduce current tax liability
Improve after-tax cash flow
Because depreciation is allocated regardless of whether cash is distributed, investors can receive cash flow that is partially or fully tax-deferred in earlier years.
Depreciation typically creates passive losses for investors.
For most investors, passive losses:
Can offset passive income from real estate, including income from other syndications
Cannot offset active or wage income, or income from stocks and other non-passive investments
Unused passive losses do not disappear. They carry forward and may be applied in future years to offset passive income, or may be recognized when the investment is sold.
This is one reason depreciation tends to be most effective for investors who hold multiple passive real estate investments over time.
Cost segregation is an engineering-based analysis that identifies components of a property that can be depreciated over shorter time periods. Rather than depreciating the entire property over a long schedule, cost segregation allows certain portions to be written off more quickly.
In syndications, this often results in:
Front-loaded depreciation
Larger deductions in early years
Greater tax deferral earlier in the hold period
Under current law, accelerated depreciation may allow a significant portion of these deductions to be recognized earlier in the investment lifecycle, increasing the amount of depreciation available in initial years. Cost segregation does not increase total depreciation – it accelerates it.
Whether cost segregation is appropriate depends on factors such as asset type, purchase price, expected hold period, and investor tax profile.
Depreciation does not disappear when a property is sold.
As depreciation is claimed, it reduces the property’s tax basis. When the asset is sold:
Previously claimed depreciation is recaptured
Recapture is generally taxed at rates of up to 25% under current law
Any remaining gain above the adjusted basis is typically taxed as a capital gain
Because depreciation lowers basis, recapture represents taxes owed on prior deferral rather than a simple substitution for capital gains. The value of depreciation therefore depends less on avoiding taxes entirely and more on when those taxes are paid.
Acknowledging recapture does not negate the benefit of depreciation.
The value of depreciation lies in time value of money:
Taxes are deferred rather than eliminated
Capital can be reinvested or compounded elsewhere
The IRS effectively provides a no- or low-interest loan during the hold period
When evaluated over long horizons and across multiple investments, this deferral can materially improve after-tax outcomes even when recapture is eventually due.
Depreciation tends to be more impactful at the portfolio level than in a single investment.
As investors add deals over time:
Depreciation from newer investments can offset income from stabilized properties
Taxable income may be smoothed across years
After-tax cash flow can become more predictable
This “laddering” effect is one reason many experienced LPs think about depreciation across multiple investments rather than deal by deal.
Tax benefits should not be the primary reason to invest in a deal.
They should be evaluated after assessing:
Market and asset fundamentals
Underwriting discipline
Sponsor execution capability
(For deal-level context, see How to Compare Multiple Deals Side by Side.)
Tax reporting mechanics are addressed further in the K-1 Guide for New Limited Partners.
Depreciation and cost segregation influence when taxes are paid, not whether value exists.
When paired with disciplined underwriting, long-term execution, and a portfolio-level perspective, these tools can meaningfully improve after-tax outcomes for passive investors – even while remaining fully taxable over time.
Note: This material is for educational purposes only and is not intended as tax, legal, or investment advice. Tax outcomes can vary significantly based on individual circumstances. Investors should consult with a qualified CPA or tax professional regarding their specific situation.
This article is part of a broader learning series on passive real estate investing.
→ Start from the beginning here: Passive Real Estate Investing Learning Guide
→ Next recommended read: K-1 Guide for New Limited Partners
© 2026 Archline Equity. All rights reserved.